In Deathloop, the Core i7-4710HQ is slightly slower than the Xeon W3520. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i7-4710HQ
- Is 5 years and 1 day newer – Apr 01, 2014 vs Mar 30, 2009
- Is 5 years and 1 day newer
- Consumes up to 64% less energy – 47 vs 130 Watts
- Consumes up to 64% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Xeon W3520
- Up to 2% faster in Deathloop – 223 vs 218 FPS
- Up to 2% faster in Deathloop
Deathloop FPS Calculator
Core i7-4710HQ vs Xeon W3520: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-4710HQ vs Xeon W3520 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-4710HQ vs Xeon W3520 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-4710HQ
Apr 1st, 2014
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
75%
Base Frequency
2.5 GHz
94%
Turbo Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
100%
Xeon W3520
Mar 30th, 2009
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.666 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
2.933 GHz
84%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-4710HQ Apr 1st, 2014 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Xeon W3520 Mar 30th, 2009 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Apr 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Mar 30th, 2009 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Laptop | Segment | Server |
| Intel BGA 1364 | Socket | LGA1366 |
47W | Power Consumption | 130W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1600 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | DDR3 |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
