In Deathloop, the Core i7-4710HQ is slightly slower than the Xeon E5630. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i7-4710HQ
- Is 4 years and 16 days newer – Apr 01, 2014 vs Mar 16, 2010
- Is 4 years and 16 days newer
- Consumes up to 41% less energy – 47 vs 80 Watts
- Consumes up to 41% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Xeon E5630
- Up to 3% faster in Deathloop – 224 vs 218 FPS
- Up to 3% faster in Deathloop
Deathloop FPS Calculator
Core i7-4710HQ vs Xeon E5630: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-4710HQ vs Xeon E5630 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-4710HQ vs Xeon E5630 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-4710HQ
Apr 1st, 2014
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
50%
Base Frequency
2.5 GHz
99%
Turbo Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
100%
Xeon E5630
Mar 16th, 2010
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.533 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
2.8 GHz
80%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-4710HQ Apr 1st, 2014 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Xeon E5630 Mar 16th, 2010 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Apr 1st, 2014 | Released | Mar 16th, 2010 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Laptop | Segment | Server |
| Intel BGA 1364 | Socket | LGA1366 |
47 W | Power Consumption | 80 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1600 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | DDR3 |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
