In The Last of Us Part I, the Core i7-4710HQ is slightly slower than the Xeon E5520. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i7-4710HQ
- Is 5 years and 1 day newer – Apr 01, 2014 vs Mar 30, 2009
- Is 5 years and 1 day newer
- Consumes up to 41% less energy – 47 vs 80 Watts
- Consumes up to 41% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Xeon E5520
- Up to 5% faster in The Last of Us Part I – 243 vs 231 FPS
- Up to 5% faster in The Last of Us Part I
The Last of Us Part I FPS Calculator
Core i7-4710HQ vs Xeon E5520: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-4710HQ vs Xeon E5520 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-4710HQ vs Xeon E5520 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-4710HQ
Apr 1st, 2014
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
75%
Base Frequency
2.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
100%
Xeon E5520
Mar 30th, 2009
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.266 GHz
91%
Turbo Frequency
2.533 GHz
72%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-4710HQ Apr 1st, 2014 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Xeon E5520 Mar 30th, 2009 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Apr 1st, 2014 | Released | Mar 30th, 2009 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Laptop | Segment | Server |
| Intel BGA 1364 | Socket | LGA1366 |
47 W | Power Consumption | 80 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1600 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | DDR3 |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
