In DOOM Eternal, the Core i7-4710HQ is slightly slower than the Core Ultra 9 275HX. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i7-4710HQ
- Consumes up to 15% less energy – 47 vs 55 Watts
- Consumes up to 15% less energy
Core Ultra 9 275HX
- Up to 9% faster in DOOM Eternal – 849 vs 779 FPS
- Up to 9% faster in DOOM Eternal
- Is 10 years and 9 months newer – Jan 13, 2025 vs Apr 01, 2014
- Is 10 years and 9 months newer
DOOM Eternal FPS Calculator
Core i7-4710HQ vs Core Ultra 9 275HX: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core Ultra 9 275HX
Jan 13th, 2025
Average FPS
849 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
587 FPS
100%
Price, $
...
Value, $/FPS
...
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-4710HQ vs Core Ultra 9 275HX in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-4710HQ vs Core Ultra 9 275HX in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-4710HQ
Apr 1st, 2014
Cores
4-core
17%
L3 Cache
6 MB
17%
Base Frequency
2.5 GHz
93%
Turbo Frequency
3.5 GHz
65%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
25%
Core Ultra 9 275HX
Jan 13th, 2025
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
6400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-4710HQ Apr 1st, 2014 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core Ultra 9 275HX Jan 13th, 2025 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Apr 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Jan 13th, 2025 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Laptop | Segment | Laptop |
| Intel BGA 1364 | Socket | Intel BGA 2114 |
47W | Power Consumption | 55W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1600 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 6400 MHz (DDR5) |
| Intel HD 4600 | Integrated GPU | Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
