In Atomfall, the Core i7-4710HQ is slightly slower than the Core i5-11600KF. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i7-4710HQ
- Consumes up to 62% less energy – 47 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 62% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i5-11600KF
- Up to 14% faster in Atomfall – 227 vs 200 FPS
- Up to 14% faster in Atomfall
- Is 6 years and 11 months newer – Mar 16, 2021 vs Apr 01, 2014
- Is 6 years and 11 months newer
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i7-4710HQ vs Core i5-11600KF: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i5-11600KF
Mar 16th, 2021
Average FPS
227 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
170 FPS
100%
Price, $
$167
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.73/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-4710HQ vs Core i5-11600KF in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-4710HQ vs Core i5-11600KF in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-4710HQ
Apr 1st, 2014
Cores
4-core
67%
L3 Cache
6 MB
50%
Base Frequency
2.5 GHz
64%
Turbo Frequency
3.5 GHz
71%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
50%
Core i5-11600KF
Mar 16th, 2021
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.9 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.9 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-4710HQ Apr 1st, 2014 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-11600KF Mar 16th, 2021 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Apr 1st, 2014 | Released | Mar 16th, 2021 |
| – | MSRP | $237.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel BGA 1364 | Socket | LGA1200 |
47 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1600 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4) |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
