In Atomfall, the Core i7-4702MQ is slower than the Ryzen 9 9900X3D. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i7-4702MQ
- Consumes up to 69% less energy – 37 vs 120 Watts
- Consumes up to 69% less energy
Ryzen 9 9900X3D
- Up to 34% faster in Atomfall – 266 vs 199 FPS
- Up to 34% faster in Atomfall
- Is 11 years and 7 months newer – Jan 06, 2025 vs May 27, 2013
- Is 11 years and 7 months newer
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i7-4702MQ vs Ryzen 9 9900X3D: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Ryzen 9 9900X3D
Jan 6th, 2025
Average FPS
266 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
199 FPS
100%
Price, $
$569
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.13/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-4702MQ vs Ryzen 9 9900X3D in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-4702MQ vs Ryzen 9 9900X3D in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-4702MQ
May 27th, 2013
Cores
4-core
33%
L3 Cache
6 MB
5%
Base Frequency
2.2 GHz
50%
Turbo Frequency
3.2 GHz
58%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
29%
Ryzen 9 9900X3D
Jan 6th, 2025
Cores
12-core
100%
L3 Cache
128 MB
100%
Base Frequency
4.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.5 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-4702MQ May 27th, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen 9 9900X3D Jan 6th, 2025 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| May 27th, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 6th, 2025 |
$383.00 | MSRP | $599.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGAG3 | Socket | AM5 |
37W | Power Consumption | 120W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1600 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
| Intel HD 4600 | Integrated GPU | Radeon Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
