In Starfield, the Core i7-4702MQ is slightly slower than the Core i9-13900F. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i7-4702MQ
- Consumes up to 43% less energy – 37 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 43% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i9-13900F
- Up to 8% faster in Starfield – 98 vs 91 FPS
- Up to 8% faster in Starfield
- Is 9 years and 7 months newer – Jan 04, 2023 vs May 27, 2013
- Is 9 years and 7 months newer
Starfield FPS Calculator
Core i7-4702MQ vs Core i9-13900F: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i9-13900F
Jan 4th, 2023
Average FPS
98 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
66 FPS
100%
Price, $
$530.07
100%
Value, $/FPS
$5.4/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-4702MQ vs Core i9-13900F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-4702MQ vs Core i9-13900F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-4702MQ
May 27th, 2013
Cores
4-core
17%
L3 Cache
6 MB
17%
Base Frequency
2.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.2 GHz
57%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
29%
Core i9-13900F
Jan 4th, 2023
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2 GHz
91%
Turbo Frequency
5.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-4702MQ May 27th, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-13900F Jan 4th, 2023 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| May 27th, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
$383.00 | MSRP | $524.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGAG3 | Socket | LGA1700 |
37W | Power Consumption | 65W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1600 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
