In Atomfall, the Core i7-4702MQ is slightly slower than the Core i7-10700K. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i7-4702MQ
- Consumes up to 70% less energy – 37 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 70% less energy
Core i7-10700K
- Up to 9% faster in Atomfall – 219 vs 201 FPS
- Up to 9% faster in Atomfall
- Is 6 years and 11 months newer – Apr 30, 2020 vs May 27, 2013
- Is 6 years and 11 months newer
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i7-4702MQ vs Core i7-10700K: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i7-10700K
Apr 30th, 2020
Average FPS
219 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
164 FPS
100%
Price, $
$349
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.59/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-4702MQ vs Core i7-10700K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-4702MQ vs Core i7-10700K in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-4702MQ
May 27th, 2013
Cores
4-core
50%
L3 Cache
6 MB
38%
Base Frequency
2.2 GHz
58%
Turbo Frequency
3.2 GHz
63%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
55%
Core i7-10700K
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
16 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.8 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.1 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2933 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-4702MQ May 27th, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-10700K Apr 30th, 2020 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| May 27th, 2013 | Released | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| $383.00 | MSRP | – |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGAG3 | Socket | LGA1200 |
37 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1600 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 2933 MHz (DDR4) |
| Intel HD 4600 | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 630 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
