In Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020, the Core i7-4702HQ is slightly faster than the Core i7-930. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i7-4702HQ
- Up to 3% faster in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 – 96 vs 93 FPS
- Up to 3% faster in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
- Is 3 years and 2 months newer – May 27, 2013 vs Feb 28, 2010
- Is 3 years and 2 months newer
- Consumes up to 72% less energy – 37 vs 130 Watts
- Consumes up to 72% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i7-930
No clear advantages
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 FPS Calculator
Core i7-4702HQ vs Core i7-930: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i7-930
Feb 28th, 2010
Average FPS
93 FPS
97%
Min 1% FPS
66 FPS
94%
Price, $
$307.29
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.3/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-4702HQ vs Core i7-930 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-4702HQ vs Core i7-930 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-4702HQ
May 27th, 2013
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
75%
Base Frequency
2.2 GHz
79%
Turbo Frequency
3.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
100%
Core i7-930
Feb 28th, 2010
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.8 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.066 GHz
96%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-4702HQ May 27th, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-930 Feb 28th, 2010 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
May 27th, 2013 | Released | Feb 28th, 2010 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel BGA 1364 | Socket | LGA1366 |
37 W | Power Consumption | 130 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1600 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | DDR3 |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
