In Atomfall, the Core i7-4700MQ is slightly faster than the Xeon X3430. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i7-4700MQ
- Up to 8% faster in Atomfall – 200 vs 186 FPS
- Up to 8% faster in Atomfall
- Is 3 years and 8 months newer – May 27, 2013 vs Sep 08, 2009
- Is 3 years and 8 months newer
- Consumes up to 51% less energy – 47 vs 95 Watts
- Consumes up to 51% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Xeon X3430
No clear advantages
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i7-4700MQ vs Xeon X3430: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-4700MQ vs Xeon X3430 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-4700MQ vs Xeon X3430 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-4700MQ
May 27th, 2013
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
75%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
100%
Xeon X3430
Sep 8th, 2009
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
2.8 GHz
82%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1333 MHz
83%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-4700MQ May 27th, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Xeon X3430 Sep 8th, 2009 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
May 27th, 2013 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2009 |
| $383.00 | MSRP | $189.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Server |
| LGAG3 | Socket | LGA1156 |
47W | Power Consumption | 95W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1600 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 1333 MHz (DDR3) |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
