In The Last of Us Part II, the Core i7-4700HQ is slightly slower than the Xeon W3565. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i7-4700HQ
- Is 3 years and 6 months newer – May 27, 2013 vs Nov 01, 2009
- Is 3 years and 6 months newer
- Consumes up to 64% less energy – 47 vs 130 Watts
- Consumes up to 64% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Xeon W3565
- Up to 9% faster in The Last of Us Part II – 199 vs 182 FPS
- Up to 9% faster in The Last of Us Part II
The Last of Us Part II FPS Calculator
Core i7-4700HQ vs Xeon W3565: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-4700HQ vs Xeon W3565 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-4700HQ vs Xeon W3565 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-4700HQ
May 27th, 2013
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
75%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
75%
Turbo Frequency
3.4 GHz
98%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
100%
Xeon W3565
Nov 1st, 2009
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.466 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-4700HQ May 27th, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Xeon W3565 Nov 1st, 2009 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
May 27th, 2013 | Released | Nov 1st, 2009 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Laptop | Segment | Server |
| Intel BGA 1364 | Socket | LGA1366 |
47 W | Power Consumption | 130 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1600 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | DDR3 |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
