In The Last of Us Part II, the Core i7-4700HQ is slightly slower than the Xeon E5640. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i7-4700HQ
- Is 3 years and 2 months newer – May 27, 2013 vs Mar 16, 2010
- Is 3 years and 2 months newer
- Consumes up to 41% less energy – 47 vs 80 Watts
- Consumes up to 41% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Xeon E5640
- Up to 11% faster in The Last of Us Part II – 202 vs 182 FPS
- Up to 11% faster in The Last of Us Part II
The Last of Us Part II FPS Calculator
Core i7-4700HQ vs Xeon E5640: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-4700HQ vs Xeon E5640 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-4700HQ vs Xeon E5640 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-4700HQ
May 27th, 2013
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
50%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
90%
Turbo Frequency
3.4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
100%
Xeon E5640
Mar 16th, 2010
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.666 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
2.933 GHz
86%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-4700HQ May 27th, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Xeon E5640 Mar 16th, 2010 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
May 27th, 2013 | Released | Mar 16th, 2010 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Laptop | Segment | Server |
| Intel BGA 1364 | Socket | LGA1366 |
47 W | Power Consumption | 80 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1600 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | DDR3 |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
