In Atomfall, the Core i7-4700HQ is slightly faster than the Opteron 3365. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i7-4700HQ
- Up to 8% faster in Atomfall – 200 vs 185 FPS
- Up to 8% faster in Atomfall
- Consumes up to 28% less energy – 47 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 28% less energy
Opteron 3365
- Is 1 month newer – Jun 27, 2013 vs May 27, 2013
- Is 1 month newer
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i7-4700HQ vs Opteron 3365: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-4700HQ vs Opteron 3365 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-4700HQ vs Opteron 3365 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-4700HQ
May 27th, 2013
Cores
4-core
50%
L3 Cache
6 MB
75%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
86%
Opteron 3365
Jun 27th, 2013
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.3 GHz
96%
Turbo Frequency
3.3 GHz
97%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-4700HQ May 27th, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Opteron 3365 Jun 27th, 2013 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| May 27th, 2013 | Release Date | Jun 27th, 2013 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Laptop | Segment | Server |
| Intel BGA 1364 | Socket | AM3+ |
47W | Power Consumption | 65W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1600 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 1866 MHz (DDR3) |
| Intel HD 4600 | Integrated GPU | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
