In Deathloop, the Core i7-4700HQ is slightly slower than the Core i5-3475S. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i7-4700HQ
- Is 11 months and 25 days newer – May 27, 2013 vs Jun 01, 2012
- Is 11 months and 25 days newer
- Consumes up to 28% less energy – 47 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 28% less energy
Core i5-3475S
- Up to 1% faster in Deathloop – 220 vs 218 FPS
- Up to 1% faster in Deathloop
Deathloop FPS Calculator
Core i7-4700HQ vs Core i5-3475S: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-4700HQ vs Core i5-3475S in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-4700HQ vs Core i5-3475S in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-4700HQ
May 27th, 2013
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
83%
Turbo Frequency
3.4 GHz
94%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
100%
Core i5-3475S
Jun 1st, 2012
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-4700HQ May 27th, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-3475S Jun 1st, 2012 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
May 27th, 2013 | Released | Jun 1st, 2012 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel BGA 1364 | Socket | LGA1155 |
47 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1600 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | DDR3 |
| Intel HD 4600 | Integrated GPU | Intel HD 4000 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
