In The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, the Core i7-4700HQ is slightly slower than the Core i5-3340M. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i7-4700HQ
- Is 4 months and 24 days newer – May 27, 2013 vs Jan 01, 2013
- Is 4 months and 24 days newer
Core i5-3340M
- Up to 5% faster in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt – 232 vs 220 FPS
- Up to 5% faster in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
- Consumes up to 26% less energy – 35 vs 47 Watts
- Consumes up to 26% less energy
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt FPS Calculator
Core i7-4700HQ vs Core i5-3340M: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i5-3340M
Jan 1st, 2013
Average FPS
232 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
157 FPS
100%
Price, $
$54.04
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.23/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-4700HQ vs Core i5-3340M in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-4700HQ vs Core i5-3340M in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-4700HQ
May 27th, 2013
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
89%
Turbo Frequency
3.4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
100%
Core i5-3340M
Jan 1st, 2013
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
3 MB
50%
Base Frequency
2.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.4 GHz
100%
Max. unknown RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-4700HQ May 27th, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-3340M Jan 1st, 2013 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
May 27th, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 1st, 2013 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Laptop | Segment | Laptop |
| Intel BGA 1364 | Socket | LGAG2 (988B) |
| 47W | Power Consumption | 35W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1600 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | unknown |
| Intel HD 4600 | Integrated GPU | Intel HD 4000 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
