In Atomfall, the Core i7-4700HQ is slightly faster than the Core i3-3210. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i7-4700HQ
- Up to 7% faster in Atomfall – 200 vs 187 FPS
- Up to 7% faster in Atomfall
- Is 4 months and 24 days newer – May 27, 2013 vs Jan 01, 2013
- Is 4 months and 24 days newer
- Consumes up to 15% less energy – 47 vs 55 Watts
- Consumes up to 15% less energy
Core i3-3210
No clear advantages
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i7-4700HQ vs Core i3-3210: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i3-3210
Jan 1st, 2013
Average FPS
187 FPS
94%
Min 1% FPS
140 FPS
93%
Price, $
$159
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.85/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-4700HQ vs Core i3-3210 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-4700HQ vs Core i3-3210 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-4700HQ
May 27th, 2013
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
75%
Turbo Frequency
3.4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
100%
Core i3-3210
Jan 1st, 2013
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
3 MB
50%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-4700HQ May 27th, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i3-3210 Jan 1st, 2013 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
May 27th, 2013 | Released | Jan 1st, 2013 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel BGA 1364 | Socket | LGA1155 |
47 W | Power Consumption | 55 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1600 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | DDR3 |
| Intel HD 4600 | Integrated GPU | Intel HD 2500 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
