In Counter-Strike 2, the Core i7-4700HQ is slightly slower than the Core i3-10100. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i7-4700HQ
- Consumes up to 28% less energy – 47 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 28% less energy
Core i3-10100
- Up to 10% faster in Counter-Strike 2 – 311 vs 284 FPS
- Up to 10% faster in Counter-Strike 2
- Is 6 years and 11 months newer – Apr 30, 2020 vs May 27, 2013
- Is 6 years and 11 months newer
Counter-Strike 2 FPS Calculator
Core i7-4700HQ vs Core i3-10100: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i3-10100
Apr 30th, 2020
Average FPS
311 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
193 FPS
100%
Price, $
$159.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.51/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-4700HQ vs Core i3-10100 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-4700HQ vs Core i3-10100 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-4700HQ
May 27th, 2013
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
67%
Turbo Frequency
3.4 GHz
79%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
60%
Core i3-10100
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-4700HQ May 27th, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i3-10100 Apr 30th, 2020 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| May 27th, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel BGA 1364 | Socket | LGA1200 |
47W | Power Consumption | 65W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1600 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 2666 MHz (DDR4) |
| Intel HD 4600 | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 630 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
