In Deathloop, the Core i7-4610M is slightly slower than the Core Ultra 7 265KF. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i7-4610M
- Consumes up to 70% less energy – 37 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 70% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core Ultra 7 265KF
- Up to 12% faster in Deathloop – 244 vs 218 FPS
- Up to 12% faster in Deathloop
- Is 10 years and 8 months newer – Oct 24, 2024 vs Feb 01, 2014
- Is 10 years and 8 months newer
Deathloop FPS Calculator
Core i7-4610M vs Core Ultra 7 265KF: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core Ultra 7 265KF
Oct 24th, 2024
Average FPS
244 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
183 FPS
100%
Price, $
$298.98
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.22/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-4610M vs Core Ultra 7 265KF in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-4610M vs Core Ultra 7 265KF in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-4610M
Feb 1st, 2014
Cores
2-core
10%
L3 Cache
4 MB
13%
Base Frequency
3 GHz
77%
Turbo Frequency
3.7 GHz
67%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
25%
Core Ultra 7 265KF
Oct 24th, 2024
Cores
20-core
100%
L3 Cache
30 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.9 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.5 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
6400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-4610M Feb 1st, 2014 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core Ultra 7 265KF Oct 24th, 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Feb 1st, 2014 | Released | Oct 24th, 2024 |
$346.00 | MSRP | $379.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGAG3 | Socket | LGA1851 |
37 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1600 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 6400 MHz (DDR5) |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
