In Battlefield 6, the Core i7-4610M is slower than the Core i9-9980XE. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i7-4610M
- Consumes up to 78% less energy – 37 vs 165 Watts
- Consumes up to 78% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i9-9980XE
- Up to 29% faster in Battlefield 6 – 85 vs 66 FPS
- Up to 29% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 4 years and 8 months newer – Oct 19, 2018 vs Feb 01, 2014
- Is 4 years and 8 months newer
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Core i7-4610M vs Core i9-9980XE: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-4610M vs Core i9-9980XE in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-4610M vs Core i9-9980XE in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-4610M
Feb 1st, 2014
Cores
2-core
11%
L3 Cache
4 MB
16%
Base Frequency
3 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.7 GHz
82%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
60%
Core i9-9980XE
Oct 19th, 2018
Cores
18-core
100%
L3 Cache
24.75 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.5 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-4610M Feb 1st, 2014 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-9980XE Oct 19th, 2018 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Feb 1st, 2014 | Released | Oct 19th, 2018 |
$346.00 | MSRP | $1,979.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGAG3 | Socket | LGA2066 |
37 W | Power Consumption | 165 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1600 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 2666 MHz (DDR4) |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
