In Battlefield 6, the Core i7-4610M is quite a bit slower than the Core i9-13900KF. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i7-4610M
- Consumes up to 70% less energy – 37 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 70% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i9-13900KF
- Up to 100% faster in Battlefield 6 – 132 vs 66 FPS
- Up to 100% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 8 years and 7 months newer – Sep 27, 2022 vs Feb 01, 2014
- Is 8 years and 7 months newer
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Core i7-4610M vs Core i9-13900KF: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i9-13900KF
Sep 27th, 2022
Average FPS
132 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
99 FPS
100%
Price, $
$549
100%
Value, $/FPS
$4.15/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-4610M vs Core i9-13900KF in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-4610M vs Core i9-13900KF in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-4610M
Feb 1st, 2014
Cores
2-core
8%
L3 Cache
4 MB
11%
Base Frequency
3 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.7 GHz
64%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
29%
Core i9-13900KF
Sep 27th, 2022
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-4610M Feb 1st, 2014 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-13900KF Sep 27th, 2022 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Feb 1st, 2014 | Released | Sep 27th, 2022 |
$346.00 | MSRP | $564.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGAG3 | Socket | LGA1700 |
37 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1600 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
