In Deathloop, the Core i7-4610M is slightly slower than the Core i5-14400F. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i7-4610M
- Consumes up to 43% less energy – 37 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 43% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i5-14400F
- Up to 6% faster in Deathloop – 231 vs 218 FPS
- Up to 6% faster in Deathloop
- Is 9 years and 11 months newer – Jan 08, 2024 vs Feb 01, 2014
- Is 9 years and 11 months newer
Deathloop FPS Calculator
Core i7-4610M vs Core i5-14400F: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-4610M vs Core i5-14400F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-4610M vs Core i5-14400F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-4610M
Feb 1st, 2014
Cores
2-core
20%
L3 Cache
4 MB
20%
Base Frequency
3 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.7 GHz
79%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
33%
Core i5-14400F
Jan 8th, 2024
Cores
10-core
100%
L3 Cache
20 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.5 GHz
83%
Turbo Frequency
4.7 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-4610M Feb 1st, 2014 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-14400F Jan 8th, 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Feb 1st, 2014 | Released | Jan 8th, 2024 |
| $346.00 | MSRP | $196.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGAG3 | Socket | LGA1700 |
37 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1600 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 4800 MHz (DDR5) |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
