The Core i7-4610M is at least 2x faster gaming CPU than the Celeron G3900. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Core i7-4610M
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Consumes up to 27% less energy – 37 vs 51 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of the Celeron G3900
The Core i7-4610M is better in every way
Core i7-4610M vs Celeron G3900 for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i7-4610M
Feb 1st, 2014
Average FPS
204
100%
Min 1% FPS
103
100%
Price, $
Out of Stock
Value, $/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Core i7-4610M vs Celeron G3900 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-4610M vs Celeron G3900 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-4610M vs Celeron G3900 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-4610M
Feb 1st, 2014
Cores
2-core
100%
L3 Cache
4 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
75%
Celeron G3900
Sep 1st, 2015
Cores
2-core
100%
L3 Cache
4 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.8 GHz
93%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2133 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Core i7-4610M | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Celeron G3900 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Feb 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
| $346.00 | MSRP | Not Available |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel Socket G3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
| Haswell | Codename | Skylake |
37 W | Power Consumption | 51 W |
| Performance | ||
| 2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.0 GHz | Base Frequency | 2.8 GHz |
| 3.7 GHz | Turbo Frequency | Non-Turbo |
| 4 MB | L3 Cache | 4 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 @ 1600 MHz | RAM | DDR3 @ 2133 MHz, DDR4 @ 2133 MHz |
| Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
