In Atomfall, the Core i7-4600M is slightly slower than the Core i9-11900K. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i7-4600M
- Consumes up to 70% less energy – 37 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 70% less energy
Core i9-11900K
- Up to 16% faster in Atomfall – 232 vs 200 FPS
- Up to 16% faster in Atomfall
- Is 7 years and 6 months newer – Mar 16, 2021 vs Sep 01, 2013
- Is 7 years and 6 months newer
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i7-4600M vs Core i9-11900K: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i9-11900K
Mar 16th, 2021
Average FPS
232 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
174 FPS
100%
Price, $
$420.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.81/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-4600M vs Core i9-11900K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-4600M vs Core i9-11900K in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-4600M
Sep 1st, 2013
Cores
2-core
25%
L3 Cache
4 MB
25%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
83%
Turbo Frequency
3.6 GHz
68%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
50%
Core i9-11900K
Mar 16th, 2021
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
16 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-4600M Sep 1st, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-11900K Mar 16th, 2021 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 1st, 2013 | Released | Mar 16th, 2021 |
$346.00 | MSRP | $539.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGAG3 | Socket | LGA1200 |
37 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1600 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4) |
| Intel HD 4600 | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 750 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
