Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7950X3D outperforms the cheaper Core i7-3970X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-3970X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 7950X3D is 3716 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-3970X.
Advantages of Core i7-3970X
- Up to 76% cheaper than Ryzen 9 7950X3D - $176.86 vs $744.95
- Up to 68% better value when playing No Man's Sky than Ryzen 9 7950X3D - $1.11 vs $3.51 per FPS
Advantages of Ryzen 9 7950X3D
- Performs up to 32% better in No Man's Sky than Core i7-3970X - 212 vs 160 FPS
- Consumes up to 20% less energy than Intel Core i7-3970X - 120 vs 150 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-3970X - 32 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-3970X doesn't have integrated graphics
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 1st, 2012
FPS
160
75%
Value, $/FPS
$1.11/FPS
100%
Price, $
$176.86
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $176.86 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6890 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
212
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.51/FPS
32%
Price, $
$744.95
23%
FPS Winner
Buy for $744.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6890 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 1st, 2012
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-3970X | vs | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
---|---|---|
Nov 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Sandy Bridge E | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 16 |
12 | Threads | 32 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.7 GHz |
150 W | TDP | 120 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 42.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |