Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 5900X outperforms the cheaper Core i7-3970X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-3970X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 5900X is 2926 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-3970X.
Advantages of Core i7-3970X
- Up to 40% cheaper than Ryzen 9 5900X - $176.86 vs $294.95
- Up to 26% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Ryzen 9 5900X - $1.50 vs $2.02 per FPS
Advantages of Ryzen 9 5900X
- Performs up to 24% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i7-3970X - 146 vs 118 FPS
- Consumes up to 30% less energy than Intel Core i7-3970X - 105 vs 150 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-3970X - 24 vs 12 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Nov 1st, 2012
FPS
118
81%
Value, $/FPS
$1.5/FPS
100%
Price, $
$176.86
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $176.86 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6799 minutes ago
Buy for $294.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6799 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Nov 1st, 2012
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-3970X | vs | Ryzen 9 5900X |
---|---|---|
Nov 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Nov 5th, 2020 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Sandy Bridge E | Codename | Vermeer |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 12 |
12 | Threads | 24 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
150 W | TDP | 105 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |