Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900K outperforms the cheaper Core i7-3970X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-3970X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900K is 3617 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-3970X.
Advantages of Core i7-3970X
- Up to 65% cheaper than Core i9-13900K - $176.86 vs $499.88
- Up to 61% better value when playing Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order than Core i9-13900K - $0.83 vs $2.11 per FPS
Advantages of Core i9-13900K
- Performs up to 12% better in Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order than Core i7-3970X - 237 vs 212 FPS
- Consumes up to 17% less energy than Intel Core i7-3970X - 125 vs 150 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-3970X - 32 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-3970X doesn't have integrated graphics
Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Nov 1st, 2012
FPS
212
89%
Value, $/FPS
$0.83/FPS
100%
Price, $
$176.86
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $176.86 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 281 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
237
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.11/FPS
39%
Price, $
$499.88
35%
FPS Winner
Buy for $499.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 281 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Nov 1st, 2012
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-3970X | vs | Core i9-13900K |
---|---|---|
Nov 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
Sandy Bridge E | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 24 |
12 | Threads | 32 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
150 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |