In The Last of Us Part II, the Core i7-3960X is slightly slower than the Xeon W3520. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i7-3960X
- Is 2 years and 7 months newer – Nov 14, 2011 vs Mar 30, 2009
- Is 2 years and 7 months newer
Xeon W3520
- Up to 7% faster in The Last of Us Part II – 204 vs 190 FPS
- Up to 7% faster in The Last of Us Part II
The Last of Us Part II FPS Calculator
Core i7-3960X vs Xeon W3520: Comparison of performance and price
Core i7-3960X
Nov 14th, 2011
Average FPS
190 FPS
93%
Min 1% FPS
142 FPS
93%
Price, $
$250
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.31/FPS
100%
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-3960X vs Xeon W3520 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-3960X vs Xeon W3520 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-3960X
Nov 14th, 2011
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
15 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.3 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.9 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
100%
Xeon W3520
Mar 30th, 2009
Cores
4-core
67%
L3 Cache
8 MB
53%
Base Frequency
2.666 GHz
81%
Turbo Frequency
2.933 GHz
75%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-3960X Nov 14th, 2011 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Xeon W3520 Mar 30th, 2009 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Nov 14th, 2011 | Released | Mar 30th, 2009 |
| $990.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
| LGA2011 | Socket | LGA1366 |
| 130 W | Power Consumption | 130 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1600 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | DDR3 |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
