In Deathloop, the Core i7-3960X is slightly slower than the Core i7-13700F. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i7-3960X
No clear advantages
Core i7-13700F
- Up to 8% faster in Deathloop – 237 vs 219 FPS
- Up to 8% faster in Deathloop
- Is 11 years and 1 month newer – Jan 04, 2023 vs Nov 14, 2011
- Is 11 years and 1 month newer
- Consumes up to 50% less energy – 65 vs 130 Watts
- Consumes up to 50% less energy
Deathloop FPS Calculator
Core i7-3960X vs Core i7-13700F: Comparison of performance and price
Core i7-3960X
Nov 14th, 2011
Average FPS
219 FPS
92%
Min 1% FPS
164 FPS
92%
Price, $
$250
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.14/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-3960X vs Core i7-13700F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-3960X vs Core i7-13700F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-3960X
Nov 14th, 2011
Cores
6-core
38%
L3 Cache
15 MB
50%
Base Frequency
3.3 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.9 GHz
75%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
29%
Core i7-13700F
Jan 4th, 2023
Cores
16-core
100%
L3 Cache
30 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.1 GHz
64%
Turbo Frequency
5.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-3960X Nov 14th, 2011 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-13700F Jan 4th, 2023 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Nov 14th, 2011 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
| $990.00 | MSRP | $359.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA2011 | Socket | LGA1700 |
| 130W | Power Consumption | 65W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1600 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
