In Deathloop, the Core i7-3940XM is slightly slower than the Ryzen 5 8400F. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i7-3940XM
- Consumes up to 15% less energy – 55 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 15% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Ryzen 5 8400F
- Up to 6% faster in Deathloop – 233 vs 220 FPS
- Up to 6% faster in Deathloop
- Is 11 years and 6 months newer – Apr 01, 2024 vs Sep 03, 2012
- Is 11 years and 6 months newer
Deathloop FPS Calculator
Core i7-3940XM vs Ryzen 5 8400F: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Ryzen 5 8400F
Apr 1st, 2024
Average FPS
233 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
175 FPS
100%
Price, $
$164.35
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.7/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-3940XM vs Ryzen 5 8400F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-3940XM vs Ryzen 5 8400F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-3940XM
Sep 3rd, 2012
Cores
4-core
67%
L3 Cache
8 MB
50%
Base Frequency
3 GHz
71%
Turbo Frequency
3.9 GHz
83%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Ryzen 5 8400F
Apr 1st, 2024
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
16 MB
100%
Base Frequency
4.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.7 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5200 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-3940XM Sep 3rd, 2012 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen 5 8400F Apr 1st, 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 1st, 2024 |
| – | MSRP | $170.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGAG2 (988B) | Socket | AM5 |
55W | Power Consumption | 65W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 5200 MHz (DDR5) |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
