The Core i7-3930K is at least 2x faster gaming CPU than the FX-6100, however, it's a much worse value for money, as it's $250.35 more expensive!
Advantages of the Core i7-3930K
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 12 vs 6 threads
Advantages of the FX-6100
- Up to 89% cheaper – $29.65 vs $280.00
- A much better value for money for gaming
- Consumes up to 27% less energy – 95 vs 130 Watts
- Has an integrated GPU, while the Core i7-3930K cannot run games without a dedicated GPU
Core i7-3930K vs FX-6100 for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i7-3930K
Nov 14th, 2011
Average FPS
170
100%
Min 1% FPS
114
100%
Price, $
$280
10%
Value, $/FPS
$1.64/FPS
10%
Core i7-3930K vs FX-6100 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-3930K vs FX-6100 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-3930K vs FX-6100 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-3930K
Nov 14th, 2011
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
97%
Turbo Frequency
3.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
100%
FX-6100
Oct 12th, 2011
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
67%
Base Frequency
3.3 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.6 GHz
95%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Core i7-3930K | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | FX-6100 |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Nov 14th, 2011 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
$583.00 | MSRP | Not Available |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Sandy Bridge E | Codename | Zambezi |
130 W | Power Consumption | 95 W |
Performance | ||
6 | Cores | 6 |
12 | Threads | 6 |
3.2 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.3 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 3.6 GHz |
12 MB | L3 Cache | 8 MB |
Other Features | ||
DDR3 @ 1600 MHz | RAM | DDR3 |
No | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |