The Core i7-3930K is a much faster gaming CPU than the FX-4130, however, it's a much worse value for money, as it's $227.98 more expensive!
Advantages of the Core i7-3930K
- A much faster CPU for gaming
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of the FX-4130
- Up to 81% cheaper – $52.02 vs $280.00
- A much better value for money for gaming
- Consumes up to 4% less energy – 125 vs 130 Watts
- Has an integrated GPU, while the Core i7-3930K cannot run games without a dedicated GPU
Core i7-3930K vs FX-4130 for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i7-3930K
Nov 14th, 2011
Average FPS
170
100%
Min 1% FPS
114
100%
Price, $
$280
18%
Value, $/FPS
$1.64/FPS
19%
Core i7-3930K vs FX-4130 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-3930K vs FX-4130 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-3930K vs FX-4130 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-3930K
Nov 14th, 2011
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
84%
Turbo Frequency
3.8 GHz
97%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
86%
FX-4130
Aug 27th, 2012
Cores
4-core
67%
L3 Cache
4 MB
33%
Base Frequency
3.8 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.9 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Core i7-3930K | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | FX-4130 |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Nov 14th, 2011 | Release Date | Aug 27th, 2012 |
$583.00 | MSRP | $112.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Sandy Bridge E | Codename | Zambezi |
130 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
Performance | ||
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
3.2 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.8 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 3.9 GHz |
12 MB | L3 Cache | 4 MB |
Other Features | ||
DDR3 @ 1600 MHz | RAM | DDR3 @ 1866 MHz |
No | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |