Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i7-13700K outperforms the cheaper Core i7-3930K on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i7-13700K is 3970 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-3930K.
Advantages of Core i7-3930K
- Up to 12% cheaper than Core i7-13700K - $280.00 vs $319.98
Advantages of Core i7-13700K
- Performs up to 78% better in Starfield than Core i7-3930K - 82 vs 46 FPS
- Up to 36% better value when playing Starfield than Core i7-3930K - $3.90 vs $6.09 per FPS
- Consumes up to 4% less energy than Intel Core i7-3930K - 125 vs 130 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-3930K - 24 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-3930K doesn't have integrated graphics
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $280 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 174 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
82
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.9/FPS
100%
Price, $
$319.98
87%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $319.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 174 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 14th, 2011
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-3930K | vs | Core i7-13700K |
---|---|---|
Nov 14th, 2011 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i7 |
Sandy Bridge E | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 16 |
12 | Threads | 24 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.4 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |