In The Callisto Protocol, the Core i7-3820QM is quite a bit slower than the Core i5-14400F. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i7-3820QM
- Consumes up to 31% less energy – 45 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 31% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i5-14400F
- Up to 38% faster in The Callisto Protocol – 149 vs 108 FPS
- Up to 38% faster in The Callisto Protocol
- Is 11 years and 8 months newer – Jan 08, 2024 vs Apr 29, 2012
- Is 11 years and 8 months newer
The Callisto Protocol FPS Calculator
Core i7-3820QM vs Core i5-14400F: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i5-14400F
Jan 8th, 2024
Average FPS
149 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
109 FPS
100%
Price, $
$224.17
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.5/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-3820QM vs Core i5-14400F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-3820QM vs Core i5-14400F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-3820QM
Apr 29th, 2012
Cores
4-core
40%
L3 Cache
8 MB
40%
Base Frequency
2.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.7 GHz
79%
Max. unknown RAM Speed
MHz
Core i5-14400F
Jan 8th, 2024
Cores
10-core
100%
L3 Cache
20 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.5 GHz
93%
Turbo Frequency
4.7 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-3820QM Apr 29th, 2012 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-14400F Jan 8th, 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Apr 29th, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
| – | MSRP | $196.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGAG2 (988B) | Socket | LGA1700 |
45W | Power Consumption | 65W |
| Other Features | ||
| unknown | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 4800 MHz (DDR5) |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
