Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7950X3D outperforms the cheaper Core i7-3820 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-3820 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 7950X3D is 3978 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-3820.
Advantages of Core i7-3820
- Up to 53% cheaper than Ryzen 9 7950X3D - $349.88 vs $744.99
- Up to 39% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Ryzen 9 7950X3D - $2.05 vs $3.36 per FPS
Advantages of Ryzen 9 7950X3D
- Performs up to 30% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i7-3820 - 222 vs 171 FPS
- Consumes up to 8% less energy than Intel Core i7-3820 - 120 vs 130 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-3820 - 32 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-3820 doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Feb 13th, 2012
FPS
171
77%
Value, $/FPS
$2.05/FPS
100%
Price, $
$349.88
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $349.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 176 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
222
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.36/FPS
61%
Price, $
$744.99
46%
FPS Winner
Buy for $744.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 176 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Feb 13th, 2012
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-3820 | vs | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
---|---|---|
Feb 13th, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Sandy Bridge E | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 16 |
8 | Threads | 32 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.7 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 120 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 42.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |