Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7950X outperforms the cheaper Core i7-3820 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-3820 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 7950X is 3879 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-3820.
Advantages of Core i7-3820
- Up to 70% cheaper than Ryzen 9 7950X - $151.00 vs $495.36
- Up to 69% better value when playing Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands than Ryzen 9 7950X - $0.80 vs $2.54 per FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 7950X - 130 vs 170 Watts
Advantages of Ryzen 9 7950X
- Performs up to 3% better in Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands than Core i7-3820 - 195 vs 189 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-3820 - 32 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-3820 doesn't have integrated graphics
Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $151 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6895 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
195
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.54/FPS
31%
Price, $
$495.36
30%
FPS Winner
Buy for $495.36 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6895 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Feb 13th, 2012
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-3820 | vs | Ryzen 9 7950X |
---|---|---|
Feb 13th, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Sandy Bridge E | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 16 |
8 | Threads | 32 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.7 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 170 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 45.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |