In Atomfall, the Core i7-3820 is slower than the Core Ultra 7 265F. However, it's a better value for money, as it's $137 cheaper!
Core i7-3820
- Up to 48% cheaper – $151.00 vs $288.00
- Up to 48% cheaper
- Up to 33% better value in Atomfall – $0.78 vs $1.17/FPS
- Up to 33% better value in Atomfall
Core Ultra 7 265F
- Up to 27% faster in Atomfall – 245 vs 193 FPS
- Up to 27% faster in Atomfall
- Is 12 years and 10 months newer – Jan 07, 2025 vs Feb 13, 2012
- Is 12 years and 10 months newer
- Consumes up to 50% less energy – 65 vs 130 Watts
- Consumes up to 50% less energy
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i7-3820 vs Core Ultra 7 265F: Comparison of performance and price
Core i7-3820
Feb 13th, 2012
Average FPS
193 FPS
79%
Min 1% FPS
145 FPS
79%
Price, $
$151
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.78/FPS
100%
Core Ultra 7 265F
Jan 7th, 2025
Average FPS
245 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
184 FPS
100%
Price, $
$288
52%
Value, $/FPS
$1.17/FPS
67%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-3820 vs Core Ultra 7 265F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-3820 vs Core Ultra 7 265F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-3820
Feb 13th, 2012
Cores
4-core
20%
L3 Cache
10 MB
33%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.8 GHz
72%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
25%
Core Ultra 7 265F
Jan 7th, 2025
Cores
20-core
100%
L3 Cache
30 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
67%
Turbo Frequency
5.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
6400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-3820 Feb 13th, 2012 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core Ultra 7 265F Jan 7th, 2025 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Feb 13th, 2012 | Released | Jan 7th, 2025 |
$305.00 | MSRP | $379.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA2011 | Socket | LGA1851 |
| 130 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1600 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 6400 MHz (DDR5) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
