In Dead Space, the Core i7-3820 is slightly slower than the Core i9-14900F. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i7-3820
No clear advantages
Core i9-14900F
- Up to 6% faster in Dead Space – 184 vs 174 FPS
- Up to 6% faster in Dead Space
- Is 11 years and 10 months newer – Jan 08, 2024 vs Feb 13, 2012
- Is 11 years and 10 months newer
- Consumes up to 50% less energy – 65 vs 130 Watts
- Consumes up to 50% less energy
Dead Space FPS Calculator
Core i7-3820 vs Core i9-14900F: Comparison of performance and price
Core i7-3820
Feb 13th, 2012
Average FPS
174 FPS
95%
Min 1% FPS
89 FPS
87%
Price, $
$349.88
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.01/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-3820 vs Core i9-14900F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-3820 vs Core i9-14900F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-3820
Feb 13th, 2012
Cores
4-core
17%
L3 Cache
10 MB
28%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.8 GHz
66%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
29%
Core i9-14900F
Jan 8th, 2024
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2 GHz
56%
Turbo Frequency
5.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-3820 Feb 13th, 2012 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-14900F Jan 8th, 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Feb 13th, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
$305.00 | MSRP | $524.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA2011 | Socket | LGA1700 |
| 130W | Power Consumption | 65W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1600 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
