In Atomfall, the Core i7-3820 is slightly slower than the Core i7-9700F. However, it's a better value for money, as it's $95 cheaper!
Core i7-3820
- Up to 39% cheaper – $151.00 vs $246.44
- Up to 39% cheaper
- Up to 32% better value in Atomfall – $0.78 vs $1.14/FPS
- Up to 32% better value in Atomfall
Core i7-9700F
- Up to 12% faster in Atomfall – 215 vs 192 FPS
- Up to 12% faster in Atomfall
- Is 7 years and 2 months newer – Apr 23, 2019 vs Feb 13, 2012
- Is 7 years and 2 months newer
- Consumes up to 50% less energy – 65 vs 130 Watts
- Consumes up to 50% less energy
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i7-3820 vs Core i7-9700F: Comparison of performance and price
Core i7-3820
Feb 13th, 2012
Average FPS
192 FPS
89%
Min 1% FPS
144 FPS
89%
Price, $
$151
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.78/FPS
100%
Core i7-9700F
Apr 23rd, 2019
Average FPS
215 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
161 FPS
100%
Price, $
$246.44
61%
Value, $/FPS
$1.14/FPS
68%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-3820 vs Core i7-9700F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-3820 vs Core i7-9700F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-3820
Feb 13th, 2012
Cores
4-core
50%
L3 Cache
10 MB
83%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.8 GHz
81%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
60%
Core i7-9700F
Apr 23rd, 2019
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3 GHz
83%
Turbo Frequency
4.7 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-3820 Feb 13th, 2012 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-9700F Apr 23rd, 2019 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Feb 13th, 2012 | Released | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
$305.00 | MSRP | $333.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA2011 | Socket | LGA1151 |
| 130 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1600 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 2666 MHz (DDR4) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
