In Atomfall, the Core i7-3820 is slower than the Core i7-14700F. However, it's a better value for money, as it's $152 cheaper!
Core i7-3820
- Up to 50% cheaper – $151.00 vs $302.97
- Up to 50% cheaper
- Up to 38% better value in Atomfall – $0.78 vs $1.25/FPS
- Up to 38% better value in Atomfall
Core i7-14700F
- Up to 25% faster in Atomfall – 242 vs 193 FPS
- Up to 25% faster in Atomfall
- Is 11 years and 10 months newer – Jan 08, 2024 vs Feb 13, 2012
- Is 11 years and 10 months newer
- Consumes up to 50% less energy – 65 vs 130 Watts
- Consumes up to 50% less energy
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i7-3820 vs Core i7-14700F: Comparison of performance and price
Core i7-3820
Feb 13th, 2012
Average FPS
193 FPS
80%
Min 1% FPS
145 FPS
80%
Price, $
$151
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.78/FPS
100%
Core i7-14700F
Jan 8th, 2024
Average FPS
242 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
182 FPS
100%
Price, $
$302.97
49%
Value, $/FPS
$1.25/FPS
62%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-3820 vs Core i7-14700F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-3820 vs Core i7-14700F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-3820
Feb 13th, 2012
Cores
4-core
20%
L3 Cache
10 MB
30%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.8 GHz
70%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
29%
Core i7-14700F
Jan 8th, 2024
Cores
20-core
100%
L3 Cache
33 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.1 GHz
58%
Turbo Frequency
5.4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-3820 Feb 13th, 2012 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-14700F Jan 8th, 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Feb 13th, 2012 | Released | Jan 8th, 2024 |
$305.00 | MSRP | $359.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA2011 | Socket | LGA1700 |
| 130 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1600 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
