In Atomfall, the Core i7-3820 is slower than the Core i5-13400F. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i7-3820
No clear advantages
Core i5-13400F
- Up to 20% faster in Atomfall – 231 vs 193 FPS
- Up to 20% faster in Atomfall
- Is 10 years and 10 months newer – Jan 04, 2023 vs Feb 13, 2012
- Is 10 years and 10 months newer
- Consumes up to 50% less energy – 65 vs 130 Watts
- Consumes up to 50% less energy
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i7-3820 vs Core i5-13400F: Comparison of performance and price
Core i7-3820
Feb 13th, 2012
Average FPS
193 FPS
84%
Min 1% FPS
145 FPS
84%
Price, $
$151
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.78/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-3820 vs Core i5-13400F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-3820 vs Core i5-13400F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-3820
Feb 13th, 2012
Cores
4-core
40%
L3 Cache
10 MB
50%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.8 GHz
83%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
33%
Core i5-13400F
Jan 4th, 2023
Cores
10-core
100%
L3 Cache
20 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.5 GHz
69%
Turbo Frequency
4.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-3820 Feb 13th, 2012 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-13400F Jan 4th, 2023 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Feb 13th, 2012 | Released | Jan 4th, 2023 |
| $305.00 | MSRP | $196.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA2011 | Socket | LGA1700 |
| 130 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1600 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 4800 MHz (DDR5) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
