In Control, the Core i7-3770T is slightly slower than the Core Ultra 9 275HX. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i7-3770T
- Consumes up to 18% less energy – 45 vs 55 Watts
- Consumes up to 18% less energy
Core Ultra 9 275HX
- Up to 3% faster in Control – 254 vs 246 FPS
- Up to 3% faster in Control
- Is 12 years and 8 months newer – Jan 13, 2025 vs Apr 29, 2012
- Is 12 years and 8 months newer
Control FPS Calculator
Core i7-3770T vs Core Ultra 9 275HX: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core Ultra 9 275HX
Jan 13th, 2025
Average FPS
254 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
167 FPS
100%
Price, $
...
Value, $/FPS
...
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-3770T vs Core Ultra 9 275HX in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-3770T vs Core Ultra 9 275HX in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-3770T
Apr 29th, 2012
Cores
4-core
17%
L3 Cache
8 MB
22%
Base Frequency
2.5 GHz
93%
Turbo Frequency
3.7 GHz
69%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core Ultra 9 275HX
Jan 13th, 2025
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
6400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-3770T Apr 29th, 2012 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core Ultra 9 275HX Jan 13th, 2025 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Apr 29th, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 13th, 2025 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Laptop |
| LGA1155 | Socket | Intel BGA 2114 |
45W | Power Consumption | 55W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 6400 MHz (DDR5) |
| Intel HD 4000 | Integrated GPU | Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
