In Atomfall, the Core i7-3770T is slower than the Core i3-14100F. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i7-3770T
- Consumes up to 22% less energy – 45 vs 58 Watts
- Consumes up to 22% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i3-14100F
- Up to 20% faster in Atomfall – 230 vs 191 FPS
- Up to 20% faster in Atomfall
- Is 11 years and 8 months newer – Jan 08, 2024 vs Apr 29, 2012
- Is 11 years and 8 months newer
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i7-3770T vs Core i3-14100F: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i3-14100F
Jan 8th, 2024
Average FPS
230 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
173 FPS
100%
Price, $
$96.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.42/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-3770T vs Core i3-14100F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-3770T vs Core i3-14100F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-3770T
Apr 29th, 2012
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
67%
Base Frequency
2.5 GHz
71%
Turbo Frequency
3.7 GHz
79%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i3-14100F
Jan 8th, 2024
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.7 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-3770T Apr 29th, 2012 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i3-14100F Jan 8th, 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Apr 29th, 2012 | Released | Jan 8th, 2024 |
| – | MSRP | $109.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1155 | Socket | LGA1700 |
45 W | Power Consumption | 58 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 4800 MHz (DDR5) |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
