The Core i7-3770K is at least 2x faster gaming CPU than the FX-4130, however, it's a much worse value for money, as it's $144.32 more expensive!
Advantages of the Core i7-3770K
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Consumes up to 38% less energy – 77 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of the FX-4130
- Up to 74% cheaper – $52.02 vs $196.34
- A much better value for money for gaming
Core i7-3770K vs FX-4130 for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i7-3770K
Apr 29th, 2012
Average FPS
172
100%
Min 1% FPS
115
100%
Price, $
$196.34
26%
Value, $/FPS
$1.14/FPS
27%
Core i7-3770K vs FX-4130 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-3770K vs FX-4130 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-3770K vs FX-4130 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-3770K
Apr 29th, 2012
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
92%
Turbo Frequency
3.9 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
86%
FX-4130
Aug 27th, 2012
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
4 MB
50%
Base Frequency
3.8 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.9 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Core i7-3770K | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | FX-4130 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Apr 29th, 2012 | Release Date | Aug 27th, 2012 |
| $313.00 | MSRP | $112.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Zambezi |
77 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Performance | ||
| 4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
| 3.5 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.8 GHz |
| 3.9 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 3.9 GHz |
8 MB | L3 Cache | 4 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 @ 1600 MHz | RAM | DDR3 @ 1866 MHz |
| Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
