Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900F outperforms the cheaper Core i7-3770 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-3770 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900F is 4271 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-3770.
Advantages of Core i7-3770
- Up to 81% cheaper than Core i9-14900F - $95.00 vs $495.81
- Up to 74% better value when playing Battlefield V than Core i9-14900F - $0.44 vs $1.68 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-14900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i9-14900F
- Performs up to 37% better in Battlefield V than Core i7-3770 - 295 vs 215 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-3770 - 32 vs 8 threads
Battlefield V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 387 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
295
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.68/FPS
26%
Price, $
$495.81
19%
FPS Winner
Buy for $495.81 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 387 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-3770 | vs | Core i9-14900F |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 24 |
8 | Threads | 32 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
77 W | TDP | Not Available |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |