In Rust, the Core i7-3667U is slower than the Core i3-14100F. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i7-3667U
- Consumes up to 71% less energy – 17 vs 58 Watts
- Consumes up to 71% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i3-14100F
- Up to 21% faster in Rust – 254 vs 210 FPS
- Up to 21% faster in Rust
- Is 11 years and 7 months newer – Jan 08, 2024 vs Jun 03, 2012
- Is 11 years and 7 months newer
Rust FPS Calculator
Core i7-3667U vs Core i3-14100F: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i3-14100F
Jan 8th, 2024
Average FPS
254 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
74 FPS
100%
Price, $
$96.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.38/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-3667U vs Core i3-14100F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-3667U vs Core i3-14100F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-3667U
Jun 3rd, 2012
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
4 MB
33%
Base Frequency
2 GHz
57%
Turbo Frequency
3.2 GHz
68%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i3-14100F
Jan 8th, 2024
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.7 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-3667U Jun 3rd, 2012 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i3-14100F Jan 8th, 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jun 3rd, 2012 | Released | Jan 8th, 2024 |
| – | MSRP | $109.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | LGA1700 |
17 W | Power Consumption | 58 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 4800 MHz (DDR5) |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
