In Atomfall, the Core i7-3630QM is slower than the Core i3-14100 and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's $80 more expensive!
Core i7-3630QM
- Consumes up to 25% less energy – 45 vs 60 Watts
- Consumes up to 25% less energy
Core i3-14100
- Up to 21% faster in Atomfall – 229 vs 190 FPS
- Up to 21% faster in Atomfall
- Is 11 years and 3 months newer – Jan 08, 2024 vs Sep 30, 2012
- Is 11 years and 3 months newer
- Up to 35% cheaper – $149.35 vs $229.00
- Up to 35% cheaper
- Up to 46% better value in Atomfall – $0.65 vs $1.20/FPS
- Up to 46% better value in Atomfall
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i7-3630QM vs Core i3-14100: Comparison of performance and price
Core i7-3630QM
Sep 30th, 2012
Average FPS
190 FPS
83%
Min 1% FPS
143 FPS
83%
Price, $
$229
65%
Value, $/FPS
$1.2/FPS
54%
Core i3-14100
Jan 8th, 2024
Average FPS
229 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
172 FPS
100%
Price, $
$149.35
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.65/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-3630QM vs Core i3-14100 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-3630QM vs Core i3-14100 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-3630QM
Sep 30th, 2012
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
50%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
69%
Turbo Frequency
3.4 GHz
72%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
33%
Core i3-14100
Jan 8th, 2024
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.7 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-3630QM Sep 30th, 2012 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i3-14100 Jan 8th, 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 30th, 2012 | Released | Jan 8th, 2024 |
| $378.00 | MSRP | $134.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGAG2 (988B) | Socket | LGA1700 |
45 W | Power Consumption | 60 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1600 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 4800 MHz (DDR5) |
| Intel HD 4000 | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 730 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
