In Control, the Core i7-3612QM is slightly slower than the Core i7-10700KF. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i7-3612QM
- Consumes up to 72% less energy – 35 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 72% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i7-10700KF
- Up to 2% faster in Control – 250 vs 246 FPS
- Up to 2% faster in Control
- Is 8 years and 1 day newer – Apr 30, 2020 vs Apr 29, 2012
- Is 8 years and 1 day newer
Control FPS Calculator
Core i7-3612QM vs Core i7-10700KF: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-3612QM vs Core i7-10700KF in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-3612QM vs Core i7-10700KF in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-3612QM
Apr 29th, 2012
Cores
4-core
50%
L3 Cache
6 MB
38%
Base Frequency
2.1 GHz
55%
Turbo Frequency
3.1 GHz
61%
Max. unknown RAM Speed
MHz
Core i7-10700KF
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
16 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.8 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.1 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2933 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-3612QM Apr 29th, 2012 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-10700KF Apr 30th, 2020 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Apr 29th, 2012 | Released | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGAG2 (988B) | Socket | LGA1200 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| unknown | RAM | 2933 MHz (DDR4) |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
