In Battlefield 6, the Core i7-3612QM is quite a bit slower than the Core i5-13400F. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i7-3612QM
- Consumes up to 46% less energy – 35 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 46% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i5-13400F
- Up to 74% faster in Battlefield 6 – 106 vs 61 FPS
- Up to 74% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 10 years and 8 months newer – Jan 04, 2023 vs Apr 29, 2012
- Is 10 years and 8 months newer
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Core i7-3612QM vs Core i5-13400F: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-3612QM vs Core i5-13400F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-3612QM vs Core i5-13400F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-3612QM
Apr 29th, 2012
Cores
4-core
40%
L3 Cache
6 MB
30%
Base Frequency
2.1 GHz
84%
Turbo Frequency
3.1 GHz
67%
Max. unknown RAM Speed
MHz
Core i5-13400F
Jan 4th, 2023
Cores
10-core
100%
L3 Cache
20 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-3612QM Apr 29th, 2012 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-13400F Jan 4th, 2023 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Apr 29th, 2012 | Released | Jan 4th, 2023 |
| – | MSRP | $196.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGAG2 (988B) | Socket | LGA1700 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| unknown | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 4800 MHz (DDR5) |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
