In The Callisto Protocol, the Core i7-3610QM is quite a bit slower than the Core i9-12900K. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i7-3610QM
- Consumes up to 64% less energy – 45 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 64% less energy
Core i9-12900K
- Up to 51% faster in The Callisto Protocol – 159 vs 105 FPS
- Up to 51% faster in The Callisto Protocol
- Is 9 years and 6 months newer – Nov 04, 2021 vs Apr 23, 2012
- Is 9 years and 6 months newer
The Callisto Protocol FPS Calculator
Core i7-3610QM vs Core i9-12900K: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i9-12900K
Nov 4th, 2021
Average FPS
159 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
115 FPS
100%
Price, $
$300.33
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.88/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-3610QM vs Core i9-12900K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-3610QM vs Core i9-12900K in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-3610QM
Apr 23rd, 2012
Cores
4-core
25%
L3 Cache
6 MB
20%
Base Frequency
2.3 GHz
72%
Turbo Frequency
3.3 GHz
63%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
33%
Core i9-12900K
Nov 4th, 2021
Cores
16-core
100%
L3 Cache
30 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-3610QM Apr 23rd, 2012 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-12900K Nov 4th, 2021 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Apr 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Nov 4th, 2021 |
$378.00 | MSRP | $599.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGAG2 (988B) | Socket | LGA1700 |
45W | Power Consumption | 125W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1600 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 4800 MHz (DDR5) |
| Intel HD 4000 | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 770 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
