The Core i7-3610QM is a much slower gaming CPU than the Athlon 3000G. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Core i7-3610QM
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of the Athlon 3000G
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Consumes up to 22% less energy – 35 vs 45 Watts
Core i7-3610QM vs Athlon 3000G for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i7-3610QM
Apr 23rd, 2012
Average FPS
169
95%
Min 1% FPS
113
96%
Price, $
Out of Stock
Value, $/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Athlon 3000G
Nov 20th, 2019
Average FPS
177
100%
Min 1% FPS
118
100%
Price, $
$84.95
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.47/FPS
100%
Core i7-3610QM vs Athlon 3000G in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-3610QM vs Athlon 3000G in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-3610QM vs Athlon 3000G in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-3610QM
Apr 23rd, 2012
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.3 GHz
66%
Turbo Frequency
3.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
100%
Athlon 3000G
Nov 20th, 2019
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
4 MB
67%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Core i7-3610QM | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Athlon 3000G |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Apr 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Nov 20th, 2019 |
$378.00 | MSRP | Not Available |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Picasso |
45 W | Power Consumption | 35 W |
Performance | ||
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
2.3 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.5 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Frequency | Non-Turbo |
6 MB | L3 Cache | 4 MB |
Other Features | ||
DDR3 @ 1600 MHz | RAM | DDR4 |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 3 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |